From one perspective, it was a failure. CFA made money, a lot of money, from all the attention (at least for now). Like the Starbucks boycott in response to their support for gay marriage equality, it made one thing clear: a company that has a loyal following among some base (whether college liberals or right wing Christians) will receive overwhelming support in the face of a boycott by their enemies.
But that does not make the boycott a failure. That line of thought misses the real purpose of the boycott.
In some conservative circles, the topic of discrimination laws sometimes comes up. Should employers be banned from discriminating against customers on the basis of race? No need, say some, because no one would go to a restaurant that refused to serve black people.
But here's the important part: that requires a specific cultural atmosphere. A cultural atmosphere that does not approve of racism.
Boycotting Chik-Fil-A is not an economic punishment. It is a message, one that creates a cultural atmosphere, one that says homophobia is not okay. I want to live in a society that collectively frowns upon homophobia, in the same way it frowns upon all sorts of terrible -isms (racism, antisemitism, sexism, ... -ism).
I would not eat at a restaurant that officially stood against interracial marriage. I would not shop at a store that opposed women's suffrage.
And I would not want to live in a society in which people did.
You should know that I have lived my whole life in Tennessee, so I have friends who will adamantly disagree with me. They went to Chick-Fil-A on August 1, just to show their support. If you think I will cut off all contact with these people because they believe homosexuality is a sin, then think again. I have no reason to cut off discourse, or marginalize those who disagree with me. They could be adamant racists, sexists, homophobes, anything, and I still wouldn't.
That does not prevent us from creating a cultural atmosphere that doesn't tolerate homophobia. Chick-Fil-A is not a friend we can invite over for dinner, converse with, and build a relationship with. It is a large, monolithic corporation that spends thousands of dollars on a homophobic agenda. Boycotting them, and other companies and groups, is not the same as marginalizing individuals. Just because you would refuse to do business with a deeply racist business, that doesn't mean you can't build a relationship with, and engage in constructive dialogue with an individual to try and positively influence how they think about things.
The last century has been a progressive one. We have seen more extraordinary advances in civil rights than any the world has ever seen, and everything points to that trend continuing with gay rights. Key Republican leaders are changing their minds on gay marriage, wanting to be on the right side of history. Even far right Christians have adjusted their rhetoric, from fire and brimstone diatribes to a genuinely compassionate, if misguided, outreach. Homosexuality is becoming accepted, and one day, homophobia will be deeply regretted, its proponents seen as misguided at best, and bigoted at worst .
As one of many of the tides of history, it probably can't be stopped. But it can be helped along by you, me, all of us, actively and consciously embracing the fact that homosexuality is good, and homophobia is wrong.
Chick-Fil-A believes the opposite to be the case. So if you get a chance, talk with Dan Cathy over a cup of coffee. Try to be a positive influence on his thinking about homosexuality. But don't eat at the restaurant he runs.
The general point about changing the cultural atmosphere is fair. However, I note three problems. The less significant is the reference to Chick-fil-A as a "monolithic corporation". As corporations are nothing more or less than groups of assorted flesh and blood people, it can confuse the issue to refer to them as though they are somehow metaphysically distinct.
ReplyDeleteMore important is the distinction between "homophobia" (an actual emotional rejection or hatred of people based on sexual preference) and sincerely held moral qualms about homosexuality or gay marriage, however mistaken such views may be. These may feed on another, but they are distinct phenomena and not correlated by necessity, which means that each must be grappled with separately for what it is. The causes, characteristics, and appropriate (or effective) responses are not the same.
Finally, you never clearly demonstrated how boycotting Chick-fil-A advances the goal of culturally combatting homophobia. If anything, it seems to have galvanized the opposite camp.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the consensus is that if you eat at Chick-fil-A you do not support gay marriage. Then if you don't eat at Chick-fil-A you could support gay marriage. That's what he means. Also Chick-fil-A uses it's funds to fund known anti gay activists and organizations that approve of the murder of homosexuals. (This is true, as a bill was passed in Uganda with the help of an organization Chick-fil-A helped fund that legalizes the death of anyone who is found to be in a homosexual relationship or commiting homosexual acts.) This is NOT GOOD. I am gay and I do NOT want to be killed or persecuted for something I can not help.
DeleteWhat I would like instead to happen is for me to have the freedom of choice to marry whom I love, donate blood, have kids, visit my partner in the hospital, not be afraid of loosing my job, not being afraid of my kids being attacked in schools, and the list goes on. All of these are things you take for granted and they are things you have. All I want are the same things. Please don't deny me those out of 'love'.
Please forgive me if I'm wrong, but it seems that you are in support of the boycott, and would like for you to reconsider.
ReplyDeleteIf you're going to argue about CFA making a stand against homosexuals, and call it a discrimination, shouldn't we ban all those Hollister, A&F, etc. etc. stores for making suggestive discrimination, rather openly on media and in their stores?
The boycott was performed in response to the religious stand. If the boycott wasn't performed, it can even be implied that the homosexuals don't give two craps about the announcement, and it's not like CFA was REFUSING to serve homosexuals either.
Previously, I didn't really care what homosexuality was shown even in public. My manager at work is gay, and he's pretty open about it, and I'm neither critical or supportive of his sexuality. However, I must say "GG" to the homosexuals, because you have thoroughly disgusted me today with the actions you took against something you can simply ignore. It just goes to show how ignorant you guys are towards reacting to such events.
Let's finish off by saying that I am a Christian. I also love CFA. I also was neutral about homosexuality... until today.